What were “blighting factors” in the 1960s?

After reading my post on two 1960s era films about urban renewal in Vancouver and Victoria, a reader asked what counted as “blighting factors” in the 1960s. To illustrate the answer, I have five pictures from a 1961 “Urban Renewal Study for Victoria.” I think I’ve seen similar pictures elsewhere, meaning that they were widely used.

Example of Blighting Factors - Mixed Uses

“Mixed Uses” & “No Space Between Buildings”: It’s ironic that we now plan for mixed use urbanism, with high density that implies little space between buildings.

Example of Blighting Factors - No Space Between Buildings

Example of Blighting Factors - Poor Environment

“Poor Environment”: I’m not sure what “poor environment” means, but think that it means planners and politicians are allowed subjective value judgements about what kind of buildings they like and don’t like, which is a poor way to plan cities. Guidelines for the type of environment we want to create in our cities have to be more explicitly stated than this one is.

Example of Blighting Factors - Poor Lot Maintainence

“Poor lot maintenance” might be fixed if we had an equitable socio-economic system in which people made enough money to maintain their buildings to a standard that they feel comfortable with.

Example of Blighting Factors - Poor Streets

“Poor Streets”: These ought to be fixed by the municipality that owns them, so that’s not a good argument for wholesale expropriation and bulldozing of the neighbourhood.

These images appear on a slide in my upcoming talk on the History of Urban Renewal in Saanich. If you’re interested in hearing more, please connect with the event on Facebook, and make sure you register to attend at the library’s event page.

Gallery | This entry was posted in Architecture, City Council, Development, Economy, Gentrification, Infrastructure, Land Use, Photographs, Planning, Public Space, Redevelopment, Sannich, Thesis, University Courses, University of Victoria, Urban Renewal, UVic, Victoria, What's wrong with this picture?, Zoning and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s